Why The Boeing 717-200 Doesn’t Have Winglets

The Boeing 717 is a twin-engine, single-aisle commercial jet airliner. It was designed and developed by McDonnell Douglas, which merged with Boeing in 1997. The 717 is a shortened, lightened version of the McDonnell Douglas DC-9, and entered service in 1999. While the 717 was designed as a modern successor to the DC-9, it has been criticized for its lack of winglets. Winglets are aerodynamic devices that are mounted on the wingtips of an aircraft and are designed to improve fuel efficiency and reduce drag. So why didn’t Boeing put winglets on the 717-200? There are a few possible explanations. One reason may be that the 717 was designed to be a shorter-range aircraft than its predecessor, the DC-9. With a shorter range, the 717 didn’t need the same level of fuel efficiency as the DC-9, so winglets may not have been seen as necessary. Another reason may be that the 717 was designed as a ‘freight-derivative’, meaning that it was intended to be used primarily for freight transport. As such, fuel efficiency may not have been as big of a priority as it would have been for a passenger aircraft. Finally, it’s possible that Boeing simply didn’t want to add the extra weight and cost of winglets to the 717. Winglets can add around 100 pounds (45 kilograms) to an aircraft’s empty weight, and they also add to the cost of manufacturing an aircraft. Whatever the reason, the lack of winglets on the 717-200 has been criticized by some as a design flaw. However, the aircraft has been generally well-received by airlines and passengers alike, and it has proven to be a popular and reliable choice for short-haul travel.

Was The Boeing 717 A Failure?

Was The Boeing 717 A Failure?
Credit: stackpathcdn

The Boeing 717 was not a failure. It was a reliable and efficient aircraft that was popular with airlines and passengers alike. It had a long production run and was only retired from service in 2019.

How Much Is A Boeing 717 Worth?

As of December 2020, a Boeing 717 is worth an estimated $28.4 million. This value is based on recent sales of similar aircraft and takes into account factors such as age, condition, and modifications.

Airlines frequently use the Boeing 777 long-range jetliner because of its roomy interior and excellent fuel economy. The engines that power this aircraft are some of the most expensive in the world, and it is critical to purchase good engines. A total of $279 million was spent by Boeing on two new 777 engines purchased from BOC Aviation this year. Because the engines are expected to last approximately 25 years, this investment is significant for the company. BOC Aviation is a leading manufacturer of commercial aircraft engines, and its engines are known for their high quality. The purchase of these engines ensures that the Boeing 777 will be a reliable and efficient aircraft for many years to come, and other airlines are likely to follow suit in the future.

Unwanted Boeing 717

The Boeing 717 is a twin-engine, single-aisle jet airliner, developed for the 100-seat market. The Boeing 717 has a cruising speed of 564 mph and a range of 2,060 miles. It entered service in 1999 and was produced until 2006. A total of 156 Boeing 717 aircraft were delivered to airlines around the world.

I chose this location because Delta is the world’s largest receiver of the CS100 and the world’s largest manufacturer of 717s. Despite its MD heritage, the 717 has few similarities to existing product lines. It takes at least 12 years to restart a production line after it has been inactive. DL employs 717s because they have allowed ATL to become even larger and more profitable by displacing RJs. These guys would not be suitable for UA or AA. In the case of a reboot, it is essentially the creation of a completely new product. If you intend to devote that much time and effort, you may as well design a completely new plane.

Because the CS100 already has a sizable market following, it will fill a significant gap that a new product like this could fill. Even if they had spare space on the production line floor, their supply chain and tooling would be completely absent. They’d cost a lot to recreate. Recently, Boeing considered restarting the line and producing approximately 50-60 United and American planes. If you were to recreate them, you would have to spend a lot of money. If they did bring back the 717, the CS100 would be significantly superior. Airlines would prefer 717s at a reasonable price on the used market.